Thursday, April 19

Federal judge decrees transgenders are now a "protected class" with special rights

Way back in 1970 or so an officer with the USSR's KGB (for students that's their main spy agency) defected to the west.  Among the many things revealed by Yuri Bezmenov was that the Soviets (communists) were in the process of executing a careful plan to destroy the U.S, not through military force but by so debasing our culture that everyone from children to senators wouldn't have any idea of the principles which made this nation different from all others.

Lacking any sense of roots or tradition or purpose, the resulting creatures--government and media "elites," professors, judges, children--would be confused:  Having no idea if America was good or bad, or if the former, how it had come to be so, they'd start tearing down the country.  Poorly educated voters would start demanding more so-called "free stuff" from the government--despite the obvious point that nothing was actually free, and ignoring who was actually paying.

Equally rootless, corrupt pols--realizing the demanding poor would vote for them, and failing to grasp the damage caused by caving in to the socialist demands--would fall over themselves to pass laws decreeing that scarce tax dollars were to be diverted from such trivia as defense and border security to really important stuff--like forcing taxpayers to pay for sex-change surgery for "transgender" members of the military.  The destructive demands of the low-info groups would be further supported by unconstitutional rulings from deluded, moronic judges who--carefully mis-educated by their professors--would support traps like "equality of outcome" even if the outcome was insanely destructive.

In 1984 the Bezmenov gave a recorded interview, describing the communist "subversion" operation in great detail.  You can read it here.  He claimed the first phase--demoralization--had already succeeded.

The goal of the operation was to change the perception of reality of every American to such an extent that despite of the abundance of information, no one is able to come to sensible conclusions in the interests of defending themselves, their families, their community or their country.

Seems to me Yuri Bezmenov's revelations explain so much of what we see today.  In particular, a decision by a federal judge just 4 days ago that made so-called "transgenders" a "protected class," making it possible for them to win massive damage awards in lawsuits if they're not treated exactly the same as everyone else.

"Wait," you say.  "Everyone in the U.S. believes in equality for everyone!  In the interest of fairness, transgenders should be treated just like everyone else!  After all, America is about fairness to all!"

No problem with fairness.  But that's not what we have with this ruling, because when a judge awards "protected class" status to a group, it gives them special rights.  Very special rights.

Specifically, they then have the special power to win huge judgments in lawsuits by suing if, for example, a police force or club or military branch has fewer members from the protected class than whatever percentage the plaintiff group says they represent in the population.  (Which, by the way, can't be known.)

In other words, the existence of any sort of unequal result wins a directed verdict for them.

If you don't understand how warped that is, it's like a 4-foot-tall person with no basketball skills suing the NBA because they don't have any 4-footers--and winning ten million bucks.  Insane.

When emperor Obama unilaterally ordered the U.S. armed forces to accept openly transgender enlistees--by his decree--people who simply declared themselves to be the opposite sex began signing up, because their pressure groups told them the military paid all health expenses for active-duty members of the armed forces.  The trannies expected they could force the military to pay for the very costly sex-change operations. 

Uh...wow.

You thin that's absurd.  But under emperor Obama, that became official military policy.

So a year ago Trump ordered recognized this absurdity for what it was.  If Obastard could order this policy into being, unilaterally, without any legislation, you'd think a later president could undo that decree.  And Trump tried that. 

But what twisted, extremist, unelected federal judges will allow a president to do change vastly depending on which party holds the presidency.  And sure enough, a federal judge has ruled that Trump can't undo the policy Obastard imposed by decree.

The KGB defector was right:  Over half the people of the U.S. have become so un-moored, so devoid of principles and common sense, that we have a judge ruling that transgenders are now a protected class--and no one has revolted.

Absurd.

Monday, April 16

Canada's socialist press "solves" a problem for their loved Trudeau: just name it something else

Wanna know how Leftist reporters and editors protect the pols they love?

They tell lies to cover the pols' asses.

You think that's hyperbole?  The Toronto Sun has incautiously let slip one little peek of one tiny corner of that process:  Last year Canada's socialist president, Justin "Baby Doc" Trudeau decided he'd embarrass Trump by graciously offering to let Canadian taxpayers pay the cost of housing and welfare for anyone "fleeing" from the awful, awful Trump regime.

Canadian conservatives (and there are a few) said they thought that was a bad idea, but reporters and their editors--far smarter and more enlightened, obviously--thought it was wonderful, so that became the official line.

And now?  Well in the last year the number of people illegally entering Canada from the U.S. has tripled.  Welfare and housing costs are going exponential.

Oooh, can't admit any of that, eh?  Fortunately the solution was simple:  with the near-full support of Canadian media, this problem has been solved.  They "euphemized it."

Oh, you're not familiar with that term?  It's the act of calling some troublesome statistic by some other, incomprehensible name.  In this case the Trudeau gruberment has begun calling it “irregular entry” rather "illegal entry."

The media is now also calling all these "irregular entrants" (i.e. illegals) “refugees,” even though no court has granted refugee status.  Basically they're all just waltzing in and demanding to be given welfare.  Sweet. 

Much like illegals are doing in the U.S.  And will continue to do until we secure our border.

Code Pink protests what they claim is "war with Syria" one day after U.S. airstrike

One day after President Donald Trump ordered air strikes against targets in Syria, demonstrators from Code Pink gathered to protest outside the White House on Saturday.

Protesters chanted ‘hands off Syria’ and held signs saying ‘No war on Syria’ and ‘Endless war for empire.’  Other demonstrators from Code Pink held a sign reading ‘Illegal and immoral war is not heroic.’  Code Pink also organized anti-Trump demonstrations in San Francisco.

In downtown Los Angeles, demonstrators organized an ‘emergency protest’ on Saturday.  A crowd of a few dozen held signs or Syrian flags. More demonstrations are scheduled for Oakland, New York City, Atlanta, Minneapolis, Chicago, and Washington DC.
Interesting:  When Hilliary and the Emperor decided to order the U.S. Air Force to engage in the sustained bombing of Libya (lasting four months), and refusing to obey the so-called "War Powers Act, I don't recall reading about a single anti-war protest.  Of course they may have been happening all over the U.S., and we just didn't hear about it.  Same effect.

And for leftists to carry signs implying that we're "at war" with Syria--I don't recall hearing "Illegal war against Libya" when Hilliary and the Emperor were running the show.  Odd, that.

Y'know, maybe it's just my cynical nature but I'm beginning to think that the U.S. Left and Dems aren't actually opposed to all war, but just when we have a Republican president.  For example, I don't recall any "anti-war" demonstrations when Bill Clinton ordered our armed forces to strike what locals claimed was a baby-formula factory in Iraq.  Not a peep.

How...interesting.  But then, Code Pink ain't exactly known for being consistent:


Anti-Christian writer calls new NYC Chick-fil-A a "creepy Infiltration" of the city

"New Yorker magazine" is eagerly read by (unsurprisingly) trendy New Yorkers.  They're so, so hip.  Cool.  Trendy.  Elite.

Just ask 'em.

So naturally they think Christianity and "the suburbs" and the South, and "flyover country" are all absolutely...well, as their wonderful leader put it, "deplorable."  (That would be "Great Leader," Hilliary, who followed "Dear Leader," the emperor.)

And like all hip leftist Democrats they just loves 'em that "die-versity."  Cuz being a religious bigot is so un-cool, right?

But there's still one group that these enlightened folks--so hip, so cool--are encouraged to denigrate, to malign: Christians.

In fact, when the popular Chik-Fil-A chain (which is Christian-owned) recently opened a new location in Manhattan, a writer for the New Yorker wrote a piece that was so oozing with contempt that many non-NYC readers thought it might be parody.

The piece was titled

Chick-fil-A’s Creepy Infiltration of New York City

 The author--one Dan Piepenbring--set the tone like this:
[T]he brand’s arrival here feels like an infiltration, in no small part because of its pervasive Christian traditionalism. Its headquarters, in Atlanta, are adorned with Bible verses and a statue of Jesus washing a disciple’s feet. Its stores close on Sundays.
Wait...isn't this a report about a restaurant in, um...New York City?  So how is that affected by the decor of the Atlanta headquarters?

Not at all.  The author included it because he felt that supported his lead theme of "creepy infiltration of New York City."

But the real offense, to confused anti-Christians like the author, is that in an interview four years ago the company's CEO was asked whether he supported same-sex marriage.  In the view of most Democrats he uttered the most offensive thing anyone can say:  "No, I don't."

When the first stand-alone New York location opened in 2015, a throng of protesters was on-hand. When a location opened in Queens a year later, socialist mayor Bill de Blasio proposed a boycott.  The repeated theme was "New York City doesn't have room for hate."  But the company had never refused to hire or serve homosexuals.  It didn't proselytize.  The sole alleged "offense" was not supporting same-sex marriage.
Outside, you can glimpse an earlier iteration of that skyline on the building’s façade, which, with two tall, imperious rectangles jutting out, “gives a subtle impression of the Twin Towers.”  This emphasis on community, especially in the misguided nod to 9/11, suggests an ulterior motive. The restaurant’s corporate purpose still begins with the words “to glorify God,” and that proselytism thrums below the surface...
You start to get a better feel for this author:  "the misguided nod to 9/11"?  Gosh, I thought most New Yorkers were grief-stricken by that attack, which devastated lower Manhattan--and killed 2,600 or so.  But author Piepenbringer sneeringly dismisses this as "misguided."

I'll bet this guy is one miserable son of a bitch.  Always miserably wailing.

Here's another of his gems:
Its arrival in the city augurs worse than a load of manure on the F train.
Of course he wouldn't say that about a Muslim restaurant.  Or Indian, or Chinese, or Tibetan.  Cuz those are cool, hip.  The New Yorker has even done gushing pieces on chicken places--but owned by blacks, not Christians.  Seems their contempt is reserved for Christian-owned businesses.

Oh, he bitches about "corporate chain restaurants."  But oddly, he doesn't complain about, say, Starbucks.  Nor about McDonald's, which regularly feeds rougly half the city's minority kids.

But he's not done yet:
[T]there’s something especially distasteful about Chick-fil-A, which has sought to portray itself as better than other fast food: cleaner, gentler, and more ethical,
Really?  I've never seen a single ad saying any of those things.  Rather, that reputation has spread by customer word of mouth.  My personal experience in scores of their stores is that the employees are far friendlier, more cheerful and more polite than in any other chain.  And if you've been to one, you probably agree.

And why do you suppose that might be, mister New Yorker author?  "Just luck," right?  Oh no, wait, I got it:  They must be discriminating in who they hire, only hiring religious white kids from flyover country.  Yeh, dat's da ticket.

Let me wrap this up:  If you don't think virtually every writer and producer for the mainstream or "elite" media loathes Christianity, and traditional values, you're naive.  They hate you.  It's one of the zillion reasons they love Islam and socialism, and hate conservatives.

In Sweden the cops, instead of investigating crime and arresting bad guys, are spending their time ferreting out 65-year-old retired Swedish women who quote a statistic on Fakebook that "immigrants" commit 95 percent of all rapes in that country.  The cops turn the ladies over to the state prosecutor, who levies $10,000 fines and threatens to puts 'em in jail if they don't pay.

If you think the same thing won't happen here if the sick fu*ks like Dan Piepenbring regain control of the entire government (as opposed to the 70 percent now controlled by the Democrat "Deep State") you're dreaming.

Sunday, April 15

In 1984 a KGB defector explained what we're seeing in the U.S. today--and seems to nail it

Yuri Bezmenov was a KGB operative.  He gradually became horrified by the communist system, and in 1970 he defected to Canada.  In 1984 he was interviewed on video, which is the clip below.

He claims the former Soviet Union was carrying out a very long-range plan to de-stabilize the U.S.  The main thrust was not spying--he claimed only about 15% of the KGB's budget is spent on espionage.  He said the other 85% is a slow process called either ideological subversion or "active measures."  In effect it was psychological warfare.

The first phase was to begin corrupting the education system, so that young Americans would have no knowledge of the fundamental beliefs or morality of the founders, but would instead believe the highest goal was to achieve absolute equality of outcome--which would be enshrined above all else. 

According to Bezmenov, by 1984 all the "opinion shapers" in the U.S.--the media and Hollywood--were amoral idiots, products of the 70's.  These faux-intellectuals had no core beliefs, so would constantly be looking for causes they could get excited about.

I'll try to get a transcript up as soon as I have time, but meanwhile it's worth hearing this guy.  Clip is 15 minutes or so, and very much to the point.



Partial transcript--I've edited it to remove a lot of quirks in the language.

Interviewer:  You spoke several times before about ideological subversion.  When the Soviets use that phrase, what do they mean?

Bezmenov: Ideological subversion is a process which is overt and open.  You can see it with your own eyes. All you have to do-- all American mass media has to do-- is to unplug their bananas from their ears, open up their eyes, and they can see it. There is no mystery. [It has] nothing to do with espionage. I know that espionage intelligence-gathering looks more romantic. 

But in reality, the main emphasis of the KGB is not in the area of intelligence at all. According to my opinion and [the] opinion of many defectors, only about 15% of time, money, and manpower [are] spent on espionage. The other 85% is a slow process, which we call either ‘ideological subversion,’ or ‘active measures’—‘[Russian term]’ in the language of the KGB—or ‘psychological warfare.’

What it basically means is **to change the perception of reality of every American to such an extent that despite of the abundance of information, no one is able to come to sensible conclusions in the interests of defending themselves, their families, their community or their country.**

It’s a huge brainwashing process that happens very slowly.  It's divided into four stages.  First is demoralization.  It takes 15 to 20 years to demoralize a nation, because this is the minimum time it takes to educate one generation of students.  In other words, Marxist-Leninist ideology is being pumped into the soft heads of at least three generations of American students, without being challenged, or counter-balanced by the basic values of Americanism (American patriotism).

The result you can see. Most of the people who graduated in the sixties (drop-outs or half-baked intellectuals) are now [this was in 1984] occupying positions of power in the government, civil service, business, mass media, [and the] educational system. You are stuck with them. You cannot get rid of them.

They are contaminated--programmed to think and react to certain stimuli in a certain way. You cannot change their mind[s].  Even if you expose them to authentic information, you still cannot change the basic perception and the logic of behavior.  For those people the process of demoralization is complete and irreversible.

To [rid your] society of these people, you'd need another 15 to 20 years to educate a new generation of patriotically-minded and common-sense people, who would act in the interests of the United States.

Interviewer:  And yet you say those people who have been ‘programmed’ and [are] in place and who are favorable to an opening with the Soviet concept... these are the very people who would be marked for execution after a communist revolution?

Bezmenov: Most of them, yes.  Because the psychological shock when they finally see what the "beautiful society" of ‘equality’ and ‘social justice’ really means, they will revolt. They will be very unhappy, frustrated people, and a Marxist regime does not tolerate such people.

Unlike in [the] present United States there will be no place for dissent in future Marxist-Leninist America. Here you can get popular like Daniel Ellsberg or filthy-rich like Jane Fonda for being a ‘dissident,’ for criticizing your Pentagon.  But in [the] future these people will be simply squashed like cockroaches. Nobody is going to pay them nothing for their beautiful, noble ideas of equality. They don't understand this so it will be a great shock for them.

The demoralization process in [the] United States is basically already complete.  For the last 25 years... actually, it's over-fulfilled because demoralization now reaches such areas where previously not even Comrade Andropov and all his experts would even dream of such a tremendous success.
Most of it is done by Americans to Americans, thanks to [a] lack of moral standards.

And as I mentioned before, even being exposed to true information does not matter anymore, because someone who's been demoralized is unable to recognize such information as true.  Facts mean nothing to him. Even if I shower him with information, with authentic proof, documents, pictures; even if I take him by force to the Soviet Union and show him [a] concentration camp, he will refuse to believe it, until he [receives] a kick in his bottom. When a military boot crushes his [gonads], he will understand. But not before that. That's the [tragedy] of the situation of demoralization.

So basically America is stuck with demoralization.  Even if you start right now, here, this minute, you start educating [a] new generation of American[s], it would still take you fifteen to twenty years to turn the tide of ideological perception of reality back to normalcy and patriotism.

The next stage is destabilization. This time [the] subverter does not care about your ideas and the patterns of your consumption; whether you eat junk food and get fat and flabby doesn’t matter any more. This time—and it takes only from two to five years to destabilize a nation—what matters [are] essentials: economy, foreign relations, [and] defense systems. And you can see it quite clearly that in some areas, in such sensitive areas as defense and [the] economy, the influence of Marxist-Leninist ideas in [the] United States is absolutely fantastic. I could never believe, fourteen years ago when I landed in this part of the world, that the process [would have gone] that fast.

The next stage is crisis. It may take only up to six weeks to bring a country to the verge of crisis. You can see it in Central America now [1984].

Finally, after crisis, with a violent change of power, structure, and economy, you have so-called "normalization."  It may last indefinitely.  "Normalization" is a cynical expression borrowed from Soviet propaganda. When the Soviet tanks moved into Czechoslovakia in ‘68, Comrade Brezhnev said, ‘Now the situation in brotherly Czechoslovakia is normalized.’

This is what will happen in [the] United States if you allow all these schmucks to bring the country to crisis, to promise people all kind[s] of goodies and the paradise on earth, to destabilize your economy, to eliminate the principle of free market competition, and to put [a] Big Brother government in Washington, D.C. with benevolent dictators like Walter Mondale, who will promise lots of thing[s], never mind whether the promises are fulfillable or not. He will go to Moscow to kiss the bottoms of [a] new generation of Soviet assassins.  He will create false illusions that the situation is under control.  But the situation is not under control.  It is disgustingly out of control.

Most of the American politicians, media, and educational system trains another generation of people who think they are living in peacetime.  False.  [The] United States is in a state of war: undeclared, total war against the basic principles and foundations of this system. And the initiator of this war is not Comrade Andropov, of course.  It's the system.  However ridiculous it may sound, [it is] the world Communist system or Communist conspiracy. Whether I scare some people or not, I don't give a hoot.  If you are not scared by now, nothing can scare you.

But you don’t have to be paranoid about it. What actually happens now [is] that unlike [me], you have literally several years to live on unless [the] United States [wakes] up. The time bomb is ticking: with every second [he snaps his fingers], the disaster is coming closer and closer. Unlike [me], you will have nowhere to defect to.  This is the last country of freedom and possibility.

Interviewer:  Okay, so what can we do? What is your recommendation to the American people?

Bezmenov:  The immediate thing that comes to my mind is that there must be a very strong national effort to educate people in the spirit of real patriotism, number one. Number two, to explain [to] them the real danger of socialist, communist, whatever, welfare state, Big Brother government. If people fail to grasp the danger of that development, nothing ever can help [the] United States. You may kiss good bye to your freedom, including freedoms [for] homosexuals, [for] prison inmate[s]; all this freedom will vanish, evaporate.  Including your precious lives.

The second thing: [at] the moment at least part of [the] United States population is convinced that the danger is real. They have to force their government, and I'm not talking about sending letters, signing petitions, and all this beautiful, noble activity. I'm talking about forcing [the] United States government to stop aiding Communism. Because there is no other problem more burning and urgent than to stop the Soviet military-industrial complex from destroying whatever is left of the free world. And it is very easy to do: no credits, no technology, no money, no political or diplomatic recognition, and of course no such idiocy as grain deals to [the] USSR.

The Soviet people, 270 [million] Soviets, will be eternally thankful to you if you stop aiding [the] bunch of murderers who sit now in [the] Kremlin, and whom President Reagan respectfully calls ‘government.’ They do not govern anything, least of all such [a] complexity as the Soviet economy.

So basic[ally], two very simple... maybe two simplistic answers or solutions, but nevertheless they are the only solutions: educate yourself, [and] understand what’s going on around you. You are not living at [a] time of peace. You are in a state of war and you have precious little time to save yourself. You don’t have much time, especially if you are talking about [the] young generation. There’s not much time left for convulsions to the beautiful disco music. Very soon it will go--overnight.

If we are talking about capitalists or wealthy businessmen, I think they are selling the rope from which they will hang very soon. If they don’t stop, if they cannot curb their unsettled desire for profit, and if they keep on trading with the monster of the Soviet Communism, they are going to hang very soon.

I know it sounds unpleasant.  I know Americans don’t like to listen to things which are unpleasant, but I have defected not to tell you the stories about such idiocy as microfilm, James Bond-type espionage. This is garbage.  I have come to talk to you about survival. It’s a question of [the] survival of this system. You may ask me what is [in it] for me. Survival, obviously. Because I like... as I said, I am now in your boat. If it sinks, we sink together.

There is no other place on this planet to defect to.

First confirmed death due to fossil fuel burning warming the climate

Well finally, after 20 years of ominous warnings that so-called "global warming" was gonna kill the entire planet...Wait, the activists renamed that warming thing to something else.  What was it?

Oh yeah: "climate change."  Cuz actual, y'know, scientists found that the planet wasn't actually warming by an amount larger than the measurement error.  And of course by changing the name to "climate change" the former "warmies" would win no matter which way things went.

Is that a cool deal or what?  "Heads or tails, we win. Suckers."

Anyway, after decades of warnings that "global warming" was gonna kill people, someone has actually died from it.  And right here in the U.S!   And not just anywhere, but in the most powerful city in the nation:  New York City!

And significantly, the death was conclusively proven to be due not to some mythical "natural" cause, for example by something as silly and trivial as, um, the Sun, but was specifically tied to the dangerous, lethal, use of fossil fuels!

SEE?!!  We enlightened, educated "elites" told you knuckle-dragging, sister-marrying, gun-crazed mouthbreathers that burning fossil fuels was gonna kill people!  But did you listen?  NO!!!  So maybe now that someone has actually died from fossil fuel use, next time your betters tell you how things are you'll believe us, right?

Yes, beloved New York lawyer David Buckel was killed by the planet-killing burning of fossil fuels.  Buckel, a well-known “green” activist who was active in advancing gay and transgender rights … committed suicide by using gasoline to set himself on fire Saturday morning in a Brooklyn park.  He left a note saying he was burning himself to death using “fossil fuel” as a protest.

Interestingly, the average high-income New Yorker jets across the Atlantic or Pacific about twice a year, burning far more fossil fuel than you do.  In fact the really rich have their own jets  You'd think the guy would have started by protesting *that*.  But of course, that wouldn't have been well received by the glitterati.

It's also interesting that a) the planet isn't actually warming (outside the margin of error of the measurements), and b) the astronomy folks think there's evidence that the sun may be entering a long-term period of lower solar activity.  Which would likely mean....

Wait, what was I thinking?  Everyone with an Ivy-education--and of course that's the only education worthy of the term--knows the Sun has no effect at all on Earth's climate!  It's totally constant, never varies by even a fraction of a percent. 

But of course you wouldn't know that unless you'd graduated from Hahvahd.


Seriously, I'm not celebrating the death of a mentally ill person.  But sometimes all we can do in the face of tragedy is laugh.

How liberals view Mueller's raid on Trump's attorney

Remember, there's not a shred of evidence that Trump's attorney had a thing to do with Russia. The raid was simply designed to grab the attorney's "work product" with his clients--something that's never been allowed in the U.S. before this. Mueller's raid killed the "attorney-client privilege."

But the other key protections-- doctor-patient, spousal, and clergy-congregant--are no more protected than this one. If one out-of-control special counsel can so casually destroy this one, what is to keep the others from being as easily swept away?

https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/224b12859d08fabf99b7402dfe3daadbdeea80e93576309534575626ff559413.jpg?w=320&h=196

Saturday, April 14

Q to Comey: "Did Trump have the right to know..." Comey: I don't know"

When James Comey was director of the FBI he undertook to brief incoming president Trump on what the FBI knew about the infamous "dossier" that contained all manner of damaging claims against the new president.

Keep in mind that the FBI knew the origin of the information--a known Trump-hater--and that all the content was unsourced and unconfirmed.  Indeed, the FBI had paid a reported $150,000 for the thing. So wouldn't you think that would be part of any actual, y'know, briefing about it?

Apparently Comey didn't think that part was worth mentioning to the new president.

Comey knew about the FBI's role, and the bullshit content of the dossier, so his refusal to mention it in the so-called briefing shows that he was trying to hide the info from the president.

Oh, you didn't hear anything about that?  Gosh, that's...odd.  You'd think this would be a blockbuster revelation.  A game-changer.

So read the tweet below.  Seems a loyal Democrat propagandist--George Stephanopoulos--interviewed fired FBI director James Comey a few days ago.




George Stephanopoulos was press secretary for Bill Clinton.  He's a loyal Democrat.  When he left that position he was immediately hired by one of the alphabet networks, where he's been ever since.

Why would a loyal Democrat ask ANY question that would impugn the actions of the key agency leading the effort to cripple Trump?  Seems to me there are only two possibilities:
    1. Laundering the reputation of the network.  They want to be seen (by morons) as having been reasonably even-handed in reporting this astonishing scandal; or
    2. They're playing damage-control, setting Comey up to take the blame if the whole sordid, illegal mess unravels.  Of course this won't be a problem for Comey since he's already been fired, and his pension is secure.  And he won't lose any invitations or luster among his anti-Trump friends for trying to sabotage the president.

So...everything's still on track for the Dems and the Lying Mainstream Media.

Obama-appointed judge rules non-citizen without work permit can sue a company for not hiring him

In the latest blow to the rule of law and sanity, an Obama-appointed judge has ruled that illegal immigrants can sue an American company for refusing to hire them.

Yes, you read that right.

Federal employment law says that for non-U..S. citizens to legally work in the U.S, they have to have a "green card."  But in a classsic display of "I don't care what the law is, I'll rule for the result I want," judge Kathleen M. Williams--a former public defender appointed to the federal bench by Obama-- accused a U.S. company of discrimination for refusing to give a paid internship to an illegal immigrant who wasn't legally permitted to work in this country.

Amazing, eh?  But typical of liberal Democrat logic.  To Dems the so-called "rule of law" is just a set of suggestions, so they're free to ignore actual written laws they don't like.

In this case the Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund (MALDEF), a leftist group that has Chicago ties to Obama, brought the suit on behalf of an illegal alien.  The group pushes for free college tuition for illegal immigrants and lowering highschool graduation requirements to allow illegals to graduated.  The group openly claims the enforcement of immigration law is racist, and strongly opposes building a fence on the Mexican border.

MALDEF filed suit on behalf of one of the million or so illegals that Obama allowed to stay in the U.S. under his cunningly named "DACA" order.  It claimed that Procter & Gamble discriminated against a Venezuelan immigrant, David Rodriguez, when it refused to give him a paid internship because he was neither a U.S. citizen nor a green card holder. 

Judge Kathleen M. Williams, a former public defender appointed to the federal bench by Obama, ruled that the claims match those in a 2014 suit against another company.  In that complaint a Mexican illegal alien and DACA winner claimed that a company's policy requiring employees to have a green card if they weren't U.S. citizens discriminated against him.  The federal judge hearing that case agreed, and Williams cited that decision to justify hers.

But significantly, the actual, y'know, written DACA order doesn't just give illegals carte blanche to work in the U.S., but permits them to apply for a green card.  And as far as can be determined, every DACA beneficiary who applied got one.  But you had to apply and go thru the paperwork.  Neither of the plaintiffs in the two lawsuits did, but merely whined that since the emperor's decree allowed them to stay in the U.S., they didn't need a green card.

Cool, eh?

Remember, citizen:  If you oppose illegal immigrants, or their demanding the right to work here or get free welfare paid for by you, you're a raaacist hater.  And as soon as the Left and Dems get rid of that eeeebil Trumpy, the new, enlightened Dem gruberment will fine or jail you for thoughtcrime.

But it's for your own good.  Really.

Thursday, April 12

Obama's "dreamers"--committing crimes, getting released, committing more crimes

Democrats love the illegal aliens emperor Obama allowed--by his unilateral order--to stay in the U.S. under "DACA."  Obama (and all Dem leaders) knew that by giving the illegals amnesty, the Democrats would get an extra two million Democrat votes.


In classic Orwellian style, Obama and the Dems called his order "the DREAM act,"--"Development, Relief, and Education for Alien Minors."  "Development" was put in to make the faaabulous and oh-so-lovely acronym.

Because Dems love the prospect of a couple of million new voters, the Lying Mainstream Media has been flooding you with stories about how much "we" really really need to make these people American citizens (meaning they'll be able to vote, although many already do, illegally).  So the Media constantly churns out puff-pieces about the wonderful accomplishments of the so-called 'dreamers."  Thus we see stories about the "dreamer" who joined the military (there have been six, total, out of a million), or the one who made valedictorian, or one who got a full scholarship to Harvard.

You don't see nearly as many stories about the killers, drug dealers, drunk drivers, rapists and so on.


They happen, of course.  A lot more than you'd think.  But you don't see those stories because the Democrat-supporting, conservative-hating mainstream media doesn't want you to.



These stories do make the news, but only in local media.  The Lying Mainstream always ignores 'em.  Cuz it would show Americans that the Dems are supporting people who shouldn't be here.
  
But because of the internet, we all have access to stories that used to never get out of a 20-mile radius.  Ann Coulter listed five awful "Dreamer" crimes from just the last month:

 Child Rapist
     Police in Seaside, Oregon, arrested "dreamer" Anastacio Eugenio Lopez-Fabian, 24, for multiple rapes of a girl "younger than 14," plus assault and harassment.  Lopez-Fabian--a native of Guatemala--had been deported twice, in 2013 and 2014.

The same day he was arrested, some Oregon official ordered him released--without notifying U.S. Immigration and Customs.

So we have a twice-deported illegal who raped a child.  And the liberal morons release him without telling ICE, so they can't deport him.  Despite this outrage, this story was only in the local press.

Buying illegal handgun
    In Bowling Green, KY, dreamer Jaime Melchi-Sigas, 22, was sitting in the back seat of a car, examining an illegal handgun he intended to purchase.  He accidentally shot and killed the man in the front seat.

This item appeared in one small local Bowling Green, Kentucky, newspaper.

Rapist appeals conviction because...

   Three weeks ago, "dreamer" Alejandro Perez-Cortez, 26, appealed his five-year sentence for attempted rape, on the grounds that he was drunk at the time.

What's interesting about this case is that we have lawyers willing to bring utterly frivolous appeals on the grounds that a drunk illegal isn't responsible for attempted rape.

Drunk-driver "dreamer" kills
   In March, dreamer Ivan Gerardo Zamarripa-Castaneda, 26, was driving drunk.  He crossed the centerline and crashed into a semi, killing its driver.  This poor Mexican who was driving drunk on an interstate -- through no fault of his own -- fled the scene.

He was captured by the police the next day.  But in an all-too-common event, authorities in Colorado ordered him released without informing I.C.E.

Another child-rapist
    In Alabama, "dreamer" Juan Vazquez Cornelio, 38, was charged with raping a 10-year-old girl and sending her to the hospital.


This story never made it out of Tuscaloosa.


Now obviously, American citizens commit crimes like these too.  But illegals commit them at many times the "background" rate.  If the Lying Media told you about all the crimes committed by illegals, voters would realize what the Dems are trying to do, and they'd demand the wall be built immediately.


But the media won't tell you.  For an obvious reason.


H/T Ann Coulter

Democrats in Illinois have a bill to force all schools to teach the achievements of gays

Insanity by Democrat politicians, part #496,296:  The LGBT snowflakes in Illinois think it's just absolutely UNFAIR that taxpayer-funded schools don't teach about all the faaaabulous achievements gays have added to the U.S.  So they've persuaded their Democrat allies in the Illinois senate to introduce a bill that will force all public schools to take classroom time to teach this to all students.

Insane.  Every year highschool students learn less and less about the important things and more about bullshit like this.

Cowardly Democrat politicians--looking for votes, and to "virtue-signal"--are all too eager to go along.  They seem to think it's more important to force students to learn about the vital accomplishments of gays than to teach students things like math, history, the Constitution and so on.

You know, the things that might actually *help*.

And of course the teachers unions are absolutely fine with it.  Oh, and by the way, they've walked out of the classroom and are demonstrating the state capital for raises--which the Dem pols will give them (out of taxpayer funds) in exchange for their votes.

Hell of a system, eh?  Well, if you're gay or a teacher.

Tuesday, April 10

How Swedish authorities "responded" to this attack by Muslim immigrants is revealing




Note that Swedish police made no effort to investigate.

And that the clinic the victim went to said "Refugees have trauma too, and priority."

A serious question for kumbayah Democrats:  What do you believe will change these thugs, these monsters, so that the ones who come here will suddenly, magically, turn into good citizens?

This is the Left, laid bare; content warning

Every shit-head leftist--Antifa, Democrats, "revolutionaries"--needs to stare at the pic below until it's burned into whatever useless mass of cells you call a brain.

The monster shooting the helpless women is your side's hero Che Guevara--the 'enforcer' for Fidel Castro.  Guevara was known for executing unarmed "enemies of the Left."

The image of two 20-ish women waiting to be killed--hands at their sides, simply standing there, helpless, not trying to run--should make you realize how idiotic, how evil, is your idolization of Guevara.  But for most of you, it won't.  You simply don't understand.  Anything.

Your evil idiocy is patently obvious from the fact that you idolize Guevara.  And Fidel.  And Stalin, and Lenin, and Nicholas Maduro (communist prez of starving Venezuela) and the whole corrupt regime of North Korea, and the bloody mullahs running Iran, and...anyone, anywhere who is thuggish and ruthless and trying to tear down civilization in the name of...what?  Shooting helpless women?

This IS the Left.  Laid bare.  It's what the Left wants.  And why we must never let the government take away our right of self-defense against monsters like this.

Monday, April 9

Two minute clip of Team Obama gloating about their "win" in ridding Syria of chemical...wait, what?

For two years Obama, his Democrat supporters and the Lying Liberal Media (a.k.a. the Mainstream Media--the scum who effectively own all the airwaves in the U.S.--the so-called "public airwaves) bragged endlessly about what they claimed was a "big, big win," a total coup:  They claimed they were such great negotiators that they were able to totally rid Syria of all chemical weapons.

The emperor gloated (really, you have to watch his face as he said it) that he'd managed to do this without a military strike--due to his unmatched skill, of course.  Click here to see two minutes of Obama and Kerry and the MSM crowing about their "win."

Hmm...in that case someone should tell those 40 dead Syrian victims of the chemical weapon attack that they're really not dead.

Friday, April 6

Global warming hits Antarctica. Wait...maybe not

Many "global warming catastrophe!" types believe temperatures in Antarctica are a very reliable predictor of what's happening to the overall climate of the Earth.

At least they did when they thought the data showed Antarctica was getting warmer.  And it IS getting warmer, right?  I mean, it HAS to be, right?  Cuz, you know, da eeebil oil kompanies und ze koal kompanies are destroying our lovely planet with their awful, awful CO2!  Right?

Um...maybe we'll have to re-think whether Antarctica is a good indicator after all--cuz new data show the place may not be  may not be warming at all.  In fact the data suggesting that a century ago the place was much warmer than it is now.

Wait, wasn't the CO2 level far lower a century ago?  Why yes, it was.

But if CO2 directly drives global temperature, how could lower CO2 a century ago have produced warmer temperatures?  Something seems...um...off here.

The Japanese Meteorological Agency reports their measurements show a slight cooling even though atmospheric CO2 levels rose sharply from 1985 until 2017, according to Japanese climate blogger Kirye.  And there are other examples.

The Australian research outpost, Davis Station, reports no warming in six decades.  In a study of 13 stations from all over the continent, 10 of the stations show no trend of temperature increase and some show a slight decreasing temperature trend. Three of the stations, all of them located on the Antarctic Peninsula, show a slight warming trend. Besides the raw data listed above, two recent scientific studies confirm these observations.

So, the Antarctic temperature variations appear to be natural. That’s all well and good, but what about the ice shelves falling into the ocean that the media scream about?  Didn’t a chunk of ice the size of Delaware or maybe Florida or Texas or France or the moon break off last year?  Seems to me the Lying Media were warning us this was gonna raise sea level enough to destroy most of Florida.

In July of last year, amateur climatologist Al Gore breathlessly tweeted that “The Larsen C ice shelf has broken away from Antarctica, a jarring reminder of why we must solve the climate crisis.”

But in fact the ice on the majority of Larsen C has been thickening. Also, the break-off of Larsen C will not do anything at all to sea level since the portion of ice that broke off was already afloat, and floating ice doesn't make any more water than the part already underwater.  Really.  So maybe Miami Beach is safe for now.

But you really need to stop driving and flying.  Cuz Al Gore said so.  But don't expect him to sell his private, ocean-crossing Gulfstream jet.  Cuz he's more important than you are.  Really.

Obama administration secretly changed rules for Social Security to encourage more illegals to apply for...

When people apply for "above-board" jobs in the U.S, they have to give their employer their Social Security number.  When illegal aliens do this, three-quarters of the time it's fake.  Yes, the Social Security Administration estimates that three out of four illegal aliens use a fake Social Security number.

For over 25 years, when the Social Security Administration found a mis-match between an SS number and the name of the person who had that number, it notified employers.  This wasn't to catch illegals but was intended to ensure that the employee's wages and SS withholding were credited to the correct account.  Because if a single digit is mis-copied or transposed, the employee's SS account wouldn't get credited with those wages, which could reduce SS benefits.

Now a law professor at Temple University claims the Obama administration very quietly ordered the SS people to stop sending out those mis-match letters--in order to encourage more illegal aliens to apply for the illegal, Obama-decreed amnesty program called DACA.  Otherwise known as "two million new votes for Democrats."

Obama ordered this change because when U.S. Citizen and Immigration Services (USCIS) began accepting DACA applications in 2012, applicants were required to list all Social Security numbers they'd ever used.  Since using a fake SS number is supposedly a felony (notwithstanding Obama's having an SS number from Connecticut--a state he'd never visited when he allegedly got it), many DACA applicants would have been admitting they'd committed a felony.

As soon as this disincentive to apply for DACA was brought to the administration’s attention, the Obama empire scrambled to fix it:  Just eight days after DACA commenced, the administration ordered the Social Security Administration (SSA) to stop notifying employers when an SS number didn't match the holder's name.

A day or two later USCIS rushed out a statement that they were “not interested” in identifying individual violations of “some federal law in an employment relationship.”

Read that again:  the Obama administration's official policy was to ignore possible felony use of a fake SS number.  Illegal as hell, and unconstitutional.  But no one said boo.

Shortly after that, USCIS changed their website, telling illegal alien applicants that they should only report an SSN if it was “officially issued to you by the Social Security Administration.”

To re-cap: DACA took effect on August 15th, 2012.  Days later the Obama administration ordered USCIS to stop requiring applicants to list fake SS numbers.  Then on August 23rd--just 8 days after DACA began--the Obama administration ordered the Social Security Administration to stop notifying employers that they'd found an SS mismatch.

Even more infuriating is the fact that although Obama's Social Security munchkins were ordered to stop notifying employers about SSN mismatch on Aug. 23, 2012, they didn't notify the public in any was until more than four years later, on Sept. 16, 2016, as Obama's reign drew to a close. Even then they made no live, recordable announcement, but buried notice of the suspension in a footnote to an SSA Records Maintenance notice and, until now, was virtually unknown outside the SSA.

Apparently Team Obama didn't want voters to know about their deed.

Remember how the Lying Media positively gushed when Obastard promised that his administration would be the most transparent EVER? 

Is that transparency? 

 H/T  the Washington Times

Do ya feel like the world has gone nuts? Well...


If you follow currents events (as opposed to the bullshi*t broadcast by the moronic Mainstream Media) you probably feel like the world is out of sorts. Insanity and class warfare seem to be the norm today. Politicians seem to be either corrupt, or at the least, unwilling to do what clearly needs to be done to avoid otherwise-certain disaster.

Conventional wisdom is that no one can predict the future.  Certainly it's true that there's no way to predict whether Sally Jones will be rear-ended on Elm street tomorrow, but major trends are quite clear, and their results easy to forecast.  The problem is that people refuse to accept signs that point to results they don't want.

The president of Western Union once famously said "The telephone has too many shortcomings to be seriously considered as a means of communication."

Paul Krugman--a moron who has found his level of competence writing for the NY Times--opined in 1998 that "by 2005 or so it will have become clear that the Internet's impact on the economy has been no greater than the fax machine's.

A former president of IBM gave a speech in which he said "Why on earth would anyone need color in a computer display?"

Fast-forward to the present:  We're living through a quiet war for the future of our country.  The Left, including most Democrats, have gone from just ignoring violations of the Constitution and the law, and now are openly claiming the right to nullify Federal law at will in any area they control. 

This is the issue regarding self-declared "sanctuary states" like California.  Back during the emperor's reign, the courts ruled quite firmly that states had to defer to federal immigration law.  But when the governor of California signed a law

Ignoring the law leads to disaster, for any number of reasons--not least of which is the fact that young people deduce that no laws need to be obeyed.

This has always presaged civil war.


H/T Richard Fernandez at Belmont


Thursday, April 5

A little humor in perilous times

Thought this was funny:


The guys who made this clip nailed it:  The Left (and Democrats) seem to think it's perfectly fine to commit violence against conservatives--or anyone who disagrees with their views.

Wednesday, April 4

Group of 1,200 citizens of Central America marching north, determined to enter U.S.

As you may have read, by all accounts a gaggle of roughly 1,200 citizens of various Central American countries is marching north through Mexico--with the assistance and support of the Mexican government.  Their announced plan is to reach the U.S. border and walk in, like so many hundreds of thousands during emperor Obama's 8-year reign of error.

If they succeed, it will--with absolute certainty--trigger an avalanche of groups trying to do the same thing.

This is--simply and purely--an invasion, abetted by the Mexican government.  To his credit, Trump has said he'll mobilize the National Guard at the border to prevent the illegals from entering.

This has set the stage for a huge legal battle, since Democrats and liberals will do everything they can to get the courts to prohibit the president from mobilizing the Guard.  And as you all know, Democrats can rely on liberal judges in the 9th circuit to give them any ruling they seek.

If, as expected, the 9th Circuit court rules for the Dems, and if Trump ignores that unconstitutional ruling and uses his Constitutional authority to defend our border, the Dems will almost certainly use that action as grounds for impeachment.  But if Trump obeys the illegal ruling and lets the illegals waltz in, the nation is doomed to an endless flood of similar mass groups.

If the Guard does intercept the marchers, instead of sending 'em back where they came from there's an amusing alternative:  arrest the marchers as they enter, put 'em on buses and send em to San Francisco. 

Cuz after all, "California is a sanctuary state," eh?  Their own Dem-ruled legislature passed a law saying so, and governor "Moonbeam" Brown signed it. 

So....give Californians what their idiot lawmakers have said they want.

Monday, April 2

Democrat logic collides with reality: Murders in gun-free London match NYC


Leftists and Democrats constantly wail that we need to ban gun ownership by civilians...cuz, as they put it, "guns kill people."

Okay, Sparky.  So I guess since the U.K banned civilians from owning handguns back in 1997, London has to have far fewer murders than, say, New York, right?

Uh...no.  In Feb and March of this year the number of murders in London was virtually the same as for NYC (which has the same population).

"WAIT!" say lefties, "That's unpossible!  Cuz, GUNS kill people!  So OBVIOUSLY, if we just banned guns we wouldn't have nearly as many murders!  It's so obvious."

Except...it dowsn't seem to have helped in London.  And why?  Because the killers just switched to using knives.

But by all means, lefties and Democrats, keep lecturing us on how guns are the problem, and banning 'em is the solution.  Cuz we all know high school students are the go-to source of all wisdom when it comes to analyzing all problems, eh?

Wait, you say you don't let your teenage kid tell you how you should run the household?  You don't let 'em lecture you on budgeting, or the fine points of the legal system?  Why, I'm...shocked.  Not.