Hillary on live TV in New Hampshire, fumbles question about Bill taking half a mil from Russian bank for one speech
Two days ago Hillary Clinton gave an interview on local television in New Hampshire. It appears to have been live.
Astonishingly, the host asked Clinton why "her" State Department--which she ostensibly ran during her term as Secretary of State--approved the sale of U.S. uranium mining claims to Russia, totalling 20 percent of total U.S. reserves.
Clinton responded, “I was not personally involved because that wasn’t something the secretary of state did.”
Wait...this is a group seeking government permission to sell a huge quantity of uranium reserves to Russia, and she's claiming she wasn't involved in the approval? Hey, good thing we aren't talking about something of, you know, huge strategic importance here, eh?
If the Secretary doesn't get involved in something that crucial, why do we have one? Who the hell made the decision--the janitor? Marie Harf? Jen Psaki?
But it gets a lot more interesting: Writing in the NY Post, Peter Schweizer--author of Clinton Cash: The Untold Story of How and Why Foreign Governments and Businesses Helped Make Bill and Hillary Rich--notes that nine of the would-be sellers of these uranium-mining assets contributed a staggering $145 million to the Clinton Foundation in the months leading up to the approval they had to have to make the sale.
And she claims she wasn't involved in the decision?
Read Schweizer's article. It's pretty damning. It's pretty clear Hillary took a $145 million bribe to approve the sale of U.S. uranium mining claims to Russia. She's a crook and a traitor. And apparently a few media people are starting to question her constant lies.
Of course as soon as the questioners are fired I expect any such distressing behavior will stop immediately.
Astonishingly, the host asked Clinton why "her" State Department--which she ostensibly ran during her term as Secretary of State--approved the sale of U.S. uranium mining claims to Russia, totalling 20 percent of total U.S. reserves.
Clinton responded, “I was not personally involved because that wasn’t something the secretary of state did.”
Wait...this is a group seeking government permission to sell a huge quantity of uranium reserves to Russia, and she's claiming she wasn't involved in the approval? Hey, good thing we aren't talking about something of, you know, huge strategic importance here, eh?
If the Secretary doesn't get involved in something that crucial, why do we have one? Who the hell made the decision--the janitor? Marie Harf? Jen Psaki?
But it gets a lot more interesting: Writing in the NY Post, Peter Schweizer--author of Clinton Cash: The Untold Story of How and Why Foreign Governments and Businesses Helped Make Bill and Hillary Rich--notes that nine of the would-be sellers of these uranium-mining assets contributed a staggering $145 million to the Clinton Foundation in the months leading up to the approval they had to have to make the sale.
And she claims she wasn't involved in the decision?
Read Schweizer's article. It's pretty damning. It's pretty clear Hillary took a $145 million bribe to approve the sale of U.S. uranium mining claims to Russia. She's a crook and a traitor. And apparently a few media people are starting to question her constant lies.
Of course as soon as the questioners are fired I expect any such distressing behavior will stop immediately.
posted by SF at
9:02 PM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home